Sussex Skips v Sussex Waste Recycling Ltd [2006] DRS 3886 (20 October 2006)

1st Choice Leisure Buildings v Shearhod [2006] DRS 3944 (24 October 2006)

The Claimant P4 Limited ("P4") is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying specialist lighting systems. In particular, it produces emergency lighting systems, which are designed to comply with the...

Until 2002 the site at 135-137 Battersea High Street ("the Site") was occupied by a two storey brick building which had formerly been used by the Royal Naval Association as a Members Club under a 99 year lease from...

The Claimant, 3C Waste Limited ("3C"), is a limited company incorporated in England and Wales. It owns and operates a landfill site known as Arpley Meadows Moore, off Liverpool Road, Sankey Bridges, Warrington, ...

HM Revenue and Customs ("the Revenue") claims that the claimant, Crystalmews Ltd ("the Company"), has been the vehicle for missing trader intra-community VAT fraud. On February 13, 2006 the Revenue issued a winding...

On 27th January 2006, at the Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court before His Honour Judge Karsten QC and a jury, the Appellant was convicted of an offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm contrary to section 20 of ...

In July 2002 police officers from the National Crime Squad began keeping observations on movements at a wood yard in Rotherham. The main focus of their attention was the first appellant, Philip Hadley, the owner...

We have before us four further applications and appeals in money laundering cases which were decided in the Crown Court before the House of Lords decision in Saik. We have heard them together in view of the common...

This is an appeal against sentence by Christopher Richards. It raises an important point of principle about the jurisdiction of the court, and possible restrictions on the power created by Sexual Offences Act 2003...

This appeal is from the dismissal by the judge of an action brought by the landlords of certain premises against their former tenants for breach of the covenant to repair the premises. The landlords adduced no ...

These two appeals are about some of the categories declared by Art. 52(2) and (3) of the European Patent Convention ("EPC") not to be "inventions" and so unpatentable. The "Aerotel appeal" is in what was a patent...

Debby Reynolds, Chief Veterinary Officer said: